Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
1.
Am J Dermatopathol ; 45(1): 64-68, 2023 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2305584

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Ponatinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat chronic myeloid leukemia and Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cutaneous toxicities are a commonly reported side effect of ponatinib treatment with "rash" being one of the most common. Specific subtypes are infrequently reported, but include hyperkeratotic, folliculocentric, ichthyosiform, and pityriasis rubra pilaris-like eruptions. Herein, we highlight the clinicopathologic features of 2 cases of ponatinib-induced pityriasis rubra pilaris-like eruptions. We also classify the clinical and histopathologic features of all previously reported ponatinib-associated eruptions in the literature and discuss treatment and potential diagnostic pitfalls.


Subject(s)
Exanthema , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive , Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Humans , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris/drug therapy , Exanthema/chemically induced
2.
Cancer Med ; 12(8): 9662-9667, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2293533

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 pandemic had a considerable impact among haematological patients. On the other hand, the effect of this disease on patients (pts) affected by Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) is not clearly defined. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate mortality-hospitalization rates and possible protective factors for hospitalization in CML pts affected by COVID. METHODS: We collected data from CML patients followed at our institution whotested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The following variables were assessed: demographical data, type of TKI therapy, vaccination status, presence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), period of infection, COVID-19 presenting symptoms, severity and mortality. Data were collected retrospectively and then analysed in univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Out of a total of 325 CML pts treated at our institution, we recorded 72 SARS-CoV-2pts (22%) who tested positive with a SARS-CoV-2 PCR assay. Twenty two were infected in 2020 (30%), 16 patients in 2021 (22%) and 34 in 2022 (46%); with a hospitalization rate of 27%, 25% and 3% respectively. Of the 72 confirmed infections, 13 pts (18%; (CI) 10-28) were asymptomatic and 48 (66%; CI: 55-76) had mild symptoms. A total of 11 pts were admitted to hospital and 3 of these required ICU admission. No deaths were recorded. The probability of hospitalization was significantly reduced if patients were vaccinated (odds ratio OR 0.037 with CI: 0-0.33 p 0.002) or treated with Bosutinib (OR 0.06 with CI: 0-0.5 p 0.008). CONCLUSION: In the present study, no significant increase in mortality was noted among patients with CML as compared to the general population inItaly. Vaccination and treatment with bosutinib were identified as baseline characteristics that were associated with a decreased risk of hospitalitazion resulting from COVID-19 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , Protective Factors , Pandemics , Hospitalization , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy
3.
Br J Haematol ; 199(5): 665-678, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2255578

ABSTRACT

Despite the success of BCR-ABL-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib in chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), patients with blast phase (BP)-CML continue to have a dismal outcome with median survival of less than one year from diagnosis. Thus BP-CML remains a critical unmet clinical need in the management of CML. Our understanding of the biology of BP-CML continues to grow; genomic instability leads to acquisition of mutations which drive leukaemic progenitor cells to develop self-renewal properties, resulting in differentiation block and a poor-prognosis acute leukaemia which may be myeloid, lymphoid or bi-phenotypic. Similar advances in therapy are urgently needed to improve patient outcomes; however, this is challenging given the rarity and heterogeneity of BP-CML, leading to difficulty in designing and recruiting to prospective clinical trials. This review will explore the treatment of BP-CML, evaluating the data for TKI therapy alone, combinations with intensive chemotherapy, the role of allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation, the use of novel agents and clinical trials, as well as discussing the most appropriate methods for diagnosing BP and assessing response to therapy, and factors predicting outcome.


Subject(s)
Blast Crisis , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive , Humans , Blast Crisis/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/genetics , Prospective Studies , Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology
4.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 228, 2023 Mar 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2285483

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Two most important factors determining treatment success in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are adequate medication compliance and molecular monitoring albeit still being suboptimal. The CMyLife platform is an eHealth innovation, co-created with and for CML patients, aiming to improve their care, leading to an increased quality of life and the opportunity of hospital-free care. OBJECTIVE: To explore the effectiveness of CMyLife in terms of information provision, patient empowerment, medication compliance, molecular monitoring, and quality of life. METHODS: Effectiveness of CMyLife was explored using a patient-preference trial. Upon completion of the baseline questionnaire, participants actively used (intervention group) or did not actively use (questionnaire group) the CMyLife platform for at least 6 months, after which they completed the post-intervention questionnaire. Scores between the intervention group and the questionnaire group were compared with regard to the within-subject change between baseline and post-measurement using Generalized Estimating Equation models. RESULTS: At baseline, 33 patients were enrolled in the questionnaire group and 75 in the intervention group. Online health information knowledge improved significantly when actively using CMyLife and patients felt more empowered. No significant improvements were found regarding medication compliance and molecular monitoring, which were already outstanding. Self-reported effectiveness showed that patients experienced that using CMyLife improved their medication compliance and helped them to oversee their molecular monitoring. Patients using CMyLife reported more symptoms but were better able to manage these. CONCLUSIONS: Since hospital-free care has shown to be feasible in time of the COVID-19 pandemic, eHealth-based innovations such as CMyLife could be a solution to maintain the quality of care and make current oncological health care services more sustainable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04595955 , 22/10/2020.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive , Humans , Chronic Disease , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Pandemics , Quality of Life
6.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(26): e29660, 2022 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2051686

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) caused by a novel coronavirus-2 (CoV-2), also known as COVID-19, has spread rapidly worldwide since it is recognized as a public health emergency and has now been declared a pandemic on March 11, 2020, by the World Health Organization. The genome of SARS-CoV-2 comprises a single-stranded positive-sense RNA approximately 27 to 30 kb in size. The virus is transmitted through droplets from humans to humans. Infection with the SARS virus varies from asymptomatic to lethal, such as fever, cough, sore throat, and headache, but in severe cases, pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Recently, no specific and effective treatment has been recommended for patients infected with the SARS virus. However, several options can be investigated to control SARS-CoV-2 infection, including monoclonal antibodies, interferons, therapeutic vaccines, and molecular-based targeted drugs. In the current review, we focus on tyrosine kinase inhibitor management and their protective role in SARS-CoV-2 patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive , Humans , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Public Health , SARS-CoV-2
7.
J Hematol Oncol ; 15(1): 90, 2022 07 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1928195

ABSTRACT

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have vastly improved long-term outcomes for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). After imatinib (a first-generation TKI), second- and third-generation TKIs were developed. With five TKIs (imatinib, dasatinib, bosutinib, nilotinib, and ponatinib) targeting BCR::ABL approved in most countries, and with the recent approval of asciminib in the USA, treatment decisions are complex and require assessment of patient-specific factors. Optimal treatment strategies for CML continue to evolve, with an increased focus on achieving deep molecular responses. Using clinically relevant case studies developed by the authors of this review, we discuss three major scenarios from the perspective of international experts. Firstly, this review explores patient-specific characteristics that affect decision-making between first- and second-generation TKIs upon initial diagnosis of CML, including patient comorbidities. Secondly, a thorough assessment of therapeutic options in the event of first-line treatment failure (as defined by National Comprehensive Cancer Network and European LeukemiaNet guidelines) is discussed along with real-world considerations for monitoring optimal responses to TKI therapy. Thirdly, this review illustrates the considerations and importance of achieving treatment-free remission as a treatment goal. Due to the timing of the writing, this review addresses global challenges commonly faced by hematologists treating patients with CML during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lastly, as new treatment approaches continue to be explored in CML, this review also discusses the advent of newer therapies such as asciminib. This article may be a useful reference for physicians treating patients with CML with second-generation TKIs and, as it is focused on the physicians' international and personal experiences, may give insight into alternative approaches not previously considered.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , COVID-19 , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Dasatinib , Humans , Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Pandemics , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use
8.
ESC Heart Fail ; 9(3): 1914-1919, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1825930

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used to treat chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) can cause cardiovascular adverse events. So far, the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) charts of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) have been used to identify cancer patients at increased cardiovascular risk. The primary aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of the new cardiovascular risk assessment model proposed by the Cardio-Oncology Study Group of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC in collaboration with the International Cardio-Oncology Society (ICOS) to stratify the cardiovascular risk in CML patients, compared with SCORE risk charts. The secondary aim was to establish the incidence of adverse arterial events (AEs) in patients with CML treated with TKIs and the influence of preventive treatment with aspirin. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective single-centre observational study was carried out on 58 patients (32 men and 26 women; mean age ± SD: 59 ± 15 years) with CML treated with TKIs for a median period of 43 ± 31 months. Cardiological evaluation was performed and cardiovascular risk was estimated with SCORE risk charts and with the new risk assessment tool proposed by HFA/ICOS. AEs were recorded. According to SCORE charts and the new HFA/ICOS risk stratification tool, respectively, 46% (Group A1) and 60% (Group A2) of patients were at high-very high risk, and 54% (Group B1) and 40% (Group B2) at low-moderate risk. AEs were significantly more frequent in Group A1 than Group B1 (P value < 0.01) when considered overall; they were significantly more frequent in Group A2 than Group B2 either overall or considered individually. HFA/ICOS risk stratification tool was significantly more sensitive than SCORE (P < 0.01) in identifying patients at higher risk of cardiovascular toxicity. In addition, we did not find AEs in patients pretreated with aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: The new HFA/ICOS risk stratification model allows a more tailored cardiovascular risk stratification in patients with CML and it is more sensitive than SCORE charts.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive , Adult , Aged , Aspirin , Cardiotoxicity/etiology , Chronic Disease , Female , Heart Failure/complications , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Humans , Inducible T-Cell Co-Stimulator Protein , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/complications , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment
9.
Curr Oncol Rep ; 24(5): 645-650, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1712340

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: COVID-19 is highly contagious; since it was first identified, the virus has rapidly spread to more than 100 countries and was declared a pandemic on March 11, 2020, by the World Health Organization (WHO). This disease presents several challenges when managing patients with leukemia. We review the information about chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and COVID-19: risk factors, prognosis, and the role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). RECENT FINDINGS: At present, we find no data suggesting that patients with CML-chronic phase (CML-CP) are at higher risk of infection by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) than the general healthy population. TKIs had been proposed to fight the SARS-CoV-2-related disease (COVID-19). CML patients should continue receiving their TKIs if they have COVID-19 disease. The role of TKIs as protective factors against SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with CML should be confirmed by large-scale epidemiologic studies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/epidemiology , Pandemics , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Br J Haematol ; 194(6): 999-1006, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1258906

ABSTRACT

Patients receiving targeted cancer treatments such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been classified in the clinically extremely vulnerable group to develop severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), including patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) taking TKIs. In addition, concerns that immunocompromised individuals with solid and haematological malignancies may not mount an adequate immune response to a single dose of SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine have been raised. In the present study, we evaluated humoral and cellular immune responses after a first injection of BNT162b2 vaccine in 16 patients with CML. Seroconversion and cellular immune response before and after vaccination were assessed. By day 21 after vaccination, anti-Spike immunoglobulin G was detected in 14/16 (87·5%) of the patients with CML and all developed a neutralising antibody response [serum dilution that inhibits 50% infection (ID50 ) >50], including medium (ID50 of 200-500) or high (ID50 of 501-2000) neutralising antibodies titres in nine of the 16 (56·25%) patients. T-cell response was seen in 14/15 (93·3%) evaluable patients, with polyfunctional responses seen in 12/15 (80%) patients (polyfunctional CD4+ response nine of 15, polyfunctional CD8+ T-cell response nine of 15). These data demonstrate the immunogenicity of a single dose of SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine in most patients with CML, with both neutralising antibodies and polyfunctional T-cell responses seen in contrast to patients with solid tumour or lymphoid haematological malignancies.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms/immunology , Immunity, Cellular/drug effects , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Adult , Aged , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Female , Hematologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Humans , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology
12.
Bull Cancer ; 108(5): 490-500, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1126758

ABSTRACT

Since the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, many recommendations have been made. However, the very specific nature of acute lymphoblastic leukemias and their treatment in children and adolescents led the Leukemia Committee of the French Society for the fight against Cancers and leukemias in children and adolescents (SFCE) to propose more specific recommendations. Here is the second version of these recommendations updated according to the evolution of knowledge on COVID19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives , Adenosine Monophosphate/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Alanine/analogs & derivatives , Alanine/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Cancer Care Facilities , Child , Consolidation Chemotherapy , Drug Interactions , France/epidemiology , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy/methods , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Maintenance Chemotherapy/methods , Recurrence , Risk Assessment , Societies, Medical , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
15.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 26(7): 1676-1682, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-733073

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we aim to report the outcome of COVID-19 in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). METHOD: The data of 16 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients with CML receiving TKI and age, gender, and comorbid disease matched COVID-19 patients without cancer at a 3/1 ratio (n = 48), diagnosed between March 11, 2020 and May 22, 2020 and included in the Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Health database, were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mechanical ventilation (MV) support were lower in CML patients compared to the control group, however, these differences did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.1, and p = 0.2, respectively). The length of hospital stay was shorter in CML patients compared with the control group; however, it was not statistically significant (p = 0.8). The case fatality rate (CFR) in COVID-19 patients with CML was 6.3%, and it was 12.8% in the control group. Although the CFR in CML patients with COVID-19 was lower compared to the control group, this difference did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.5). When CML patients were divided into 3 groups according to the TKI, no significant difference was observed regarding the rate of ICU admission, MV support, CFR, the length of stay in both hospital and ICU (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study highlights that large scale prospective and randomized studies should be conducted in order to investigate the role of TKIs in the treatment of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Coronavirus Infections , Imatinib Mesylate/administration & dosage , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Turkey/epidemiology , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL